Bereitschaft zu Open Access in den Geisteswissenschaften
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/5512Keywords:
journal transformation, survey, journal editors, Open Library of Humanities, OLH, OLH-DE, Print version, non-APC models, empirical basis, assessment, open access, humanitiesAbstract
This article provides the empirical basis for an assessment of the attitude of humanities journal editors towards Open Access. Within the framework of the German Open Library of Humanities project OLH-DE at the University of Konstanz, we conducted an online survey among 416 editors of German-language humanities journals. They were not only asked about their attitudes, fears and relevant aspects of Open Access in general, but were also informed about the OLH publishing model. The results show that the attitudes among editors towards Open Access are not as negative as often feared and that many concerns can be significantly mitigated by addressing them specifically when presenting the OLH. The loss of the print version remained a significant obstacle to Open Access, highlighting the need for “print on demand” Open Access publishing models. Overall, receiving information about the OLH went along with an increased willingness to undertake Open Access transformations among the editors of humanities journals compared to their interest in Open Access in general. This result underlines the relevance of Open Access projects such as OLH-DE: A gradual Open Access transformation among editors of humanities journals can only succeed by the means of targeted Open Access promotion.
References
Babor, Thomas F.; O’Reilly, Jean; Stenius, Kerstin u. a. (Hg.): Publishing Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 2017. Online: https://doi.org/10.5334/bbd, Stand: 10.03.2020.
Christensen, Rune Haubo Bojesen: ordinal: Regression Models for Ordinal Data, Version 2019.12-10, 2019. Online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ordinal, Stand: 06.03.2020.
Dobusch, Leonhard: Open-Access-Transition von Lingua zu Glossa: Wider «die gnadenlosen Geschäftspraktiken Elseviers», netzpolitik.org, 06.02.2017, https://netzpolitik.org/2017/open-access-transition-von-lingua-zu-glossa-wider-die-die-gnadenlosen-geschaeftspraktiken-elseviers/, Stand: 06.03.2020.
Eve, Martin Paul: Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies and the Future, Cambridge 2014. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316161012.
Eve, Martin Paul; Edwards, Caroline: Opening the Open Library of Humanities, Open Library of Humanities, 28.09.2015, http://olh.openlibhums.org/articles/10.16995/olh.46/, Stand: 06.03.2020.
Kleineberg, Michael; Kaden, Ben: Open Humanities? ExpertInnenmeinungen über Open Access in den Geisteswissenschaften, LIBREAS. Library Ideas, 2017, https://libreas.eu/ausgabe32/kleineberg/, Stand: 06.03.2020.
Knöchelmann, Marcel: Open Science in the Humanities, or: Open Humanities?, in: Publications 7 (4), 12.2019, S. 65. Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7040065.
Martín-Martín, Alberto; Costas, Rodrigo; Leeuwen, Thed van u. a.: Evidence of Open Access of scientific publications in Google Scholar: a large-scale analysis, in: Journal of Informetrics 12 (3), 08.2018, S. 819–841. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2018.06.012.
Narayan, Bhuva, Henry; Luca, Edward J.; Tiffen, Belinda u. a.: Scholarly Communication Practices in Humanities and Social Sciences: A Study of Researchers’ Attitudes and Awareness of Open Access, in: The Open Information Science Journal 2, 17.12.2018, S. 168–180. Online: https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2018-0013.
Oberländer, Anja; Dreher, Lena: Sind konsortiale Modelle der Weg zu mehr Open Access in den Geisteswissenschaften? – erste Ergebnisse des Projekts OLH-DE, Graz 24.09.2018. Online: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1441040, Stand: 06.03.2020.
Piwowar, Heather; Priem, Jason; Larivière, Vincent u. a.: The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles, PeerJ, 13.02.2018, https://peerj.com/articles/4375, Stand: 06.03.2020.
Somers, James: The Scientific Paper Is Obsolete, The Atlantic, 05.04.2018, https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/04/the-scientific-paper-is-obsolete/556676/, Stand: 06.03.2020.
Wang, Xianwen; Cui, Yunxue; Xu, Shenmeng u. a.: The state and evolution of Gold Open Access: A country level analysis, in: STI 2018 Conference Proceedings, Leiden 2018. Online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9301/b0b6d2de552acdc789cf0298c06a101690a5.pdf, Stand: 10.03.2020.
Wise, Stephen A.: So, you think you want to be an editor, in: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 410, 01.02.2018, S. 1407–1408. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0824-6.
Zhu, Yimei: Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics’ OA practice, in: Scientometrics 111 (2), 2017, S. 557–579. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2316-z.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Lena Dreher, Ilona Lang, Anja Oberländer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.