CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance
Eine Leitlinie für ethische Fragen im Umgang mit Forschungsdaten?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/5815Keywords:
Indigenous, CARE, FAIR, Research Data Management, Research Ethics, Data Sovereignty, Responsability, Research DataAbstract
The CARE principles call for a more systematic and reflected consideration of ethical issues, power dynamics, and historical contexts related to the management of research data. These principles complement the existing FAIR principles, which focus primarily on the properties of data and data exchange. However, the fact that the CARE principles were developed by the Global Indigenous Data Alliance specifically for the handling of indigenous data has been largely disregarded in the current usage of CARE in the German-speaking world. A thorough examination of the context in which the principles were developed has been lacking and it is not yet well understood how CARE could be transferred to general questions of responsibility or solving ethical questions in the context of infra- structure development and data management. This paper is intended as a contribution to the debate. It outlines the context in which the principles were developed and the related concerns regarding their potentials and limitations as a general framework and ethical guideline for working with research data.
References
Anderson, Jane; Hudson, Maui: The Biocultural Labels Initiative. Supporting Indigenous Rights in Data Derived From Genetic Resources. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 4, e59230. Conference Abstract, 09.10.2020. Online: https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.4.59230.
Bens, Jonas: The Indigenous Paradox. Rights, Sovereignty, and Culture in the Americas, Philadelphia 2020.
Caroll, Stephanie Rainie; Schultz, Jennifer Lee; Briggs, Eileen u.a.: Data as a Strategic Resource. Self-determination, Governance, and the Data Challenge for Indigenous Nations in the United States, in: International Indigenous Policy Journal 8 (2), 2017. Online: https://doi.org/10.18 584/iipj.2017.8.2.1.
Carroll, Stephanie Russo; Hudson, Maui; Holbrook, Jarita u.a.: Working With the CARE Principles. Operationalizing Indigenous Data Governance, Ada Lovelace Institute Blog, 09.11.2020, https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/operationalising-indigenous-data-governance/, Stand: 21.02.2022.
Carroll, Stephanie Russo; Garba, Ibrahim; Figueroa-Rodríguez, Oscar L. u.a.: The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance, in: Data Science Journal 19 (43), 2020, S. 1–12. Online: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043.
Carroll, Stephanie Russo; Herczog, Edit; Hudson, Maui u.a.: Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR Principles for Indigenous Data Futures, in: Scientific Data 8, 108, 2021, S. 1. Online: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00892-0.
Deppe, Arvid: FAIR, CARE und mehr. Prinzipien für einen verantwortungsvollen Umgang mit Forschungsdaten, in: Schulze, Matthias (Hg.): Historisches Erbe und zeitgemäße Informationsinfrastrukturen. Bibliotheken am Anfang des 21. Jahrhunderts, Kassel 2020, S. 299–312.
Farnel Sharon: Metadata Frameworks Driven by Indigenous Communities in Canada’s North. An Exploration, Dissertation, University of Alberta 2020, https://doi.org/10.7939/r3-7qet-rp11.
Feinberg, Robby: After More Than A Century, Recordings From The Passamaquoddy Tribe Are Being Restored And Shared, Main Public Online, 05.08.2019, https://web.archive.org/web/20220311140038/https://www.mainepublic.org/arts-and-culture/2019-08-05/after-more-than-a-century-recordings-from-the-passamaquoddy-tribe-are-being-restored-and-shared, Stand: 10.03.2022.
Hummel, Patrik; Braun, Matthias; Augsberg, Steffen u.a.: Datensouveränität. Governance-Ansätze für den Gesundheitsbereich, Wiesbaden 2021. Online: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/50052.
Kammerer, Dietmar; Schrade, Torsten; Stellmacher, Martha: NFDI4Culture. Konsortium für Forschungsdaten zu materiellen und immateriellen Kulturgütern, in: Bausteine Forschungsdatenmanagement. Empfehlungen und Erfahrungsberichte für die Praxis von Forschungsdatenmanagerinnen und -managern 2, 2021, S. 23–33. Online: https://doi.org/10.17192/bfdm.2021.2.8341.
Kim, Tammy E.: The Passamaquoddy Reclaim Their Culture Through Digital Repatriation, in: The New Yorker Online, 30.01.2019, https://web.archive.org/web/20220311140412/https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/the-passamaquoddy-reclaim-their-culture-through-digital-repatriation, Stand: 10.03.2022.
Kukutai, Tahu; Taylor, John (Hg.): Indigenous Data Sovereignty. Toward an Agenda, Canberra 2016. Online: https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.
Martínez Cobo, José R.: Study of the Problem of Discrimination Against Indigenous Populations. Volume 5, Conclusions, Proposals and Recommendations, New York 1987. Online: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/133666, Stand: 22.02.2022.
Müller, Serena; Sanmurki, Miriam Harjati: Kultur als Medium indigener Selbstbestimmung, in: Groth, Stefan; Bendix, Regina F.; Spiller, Achim (Hg.): Kultur als Eigentum. Instrumente, Querschnitte und Fallstudie, Göttingen 2015, S. 119-138. Online: http://books.openedition.org/gup/542, Stand: 22.02.2022.
Proffitt, Merrilee: The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Overview and Australian activities, Hanging Together. The OCLC Research Blog, 03.03.2021, https://hangingtogether.org/the-care-principles-for-indigenous-data-governance-overview-and-australian-activities/, Stand: 10.03.2022.
Reijerkerk, Dana: UX Design in Online Catalogs: Practical Issues with Implementing Traditional Knowledge (TK) Labels, in: First Monday 25 (8), 03.08.2020. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i8.10406.
Riginos, Cynthia; Crandall, Eric D.; Liggins, Libby u.a.: Building a Global Genomics Observatory. Using GEOME (the Genomic Observatories Metadatabase) to Expedite and Improve Deposition and Retrieval of Genetic Data and Metadata for Biodiversity Research, in: Molecular Ecology Resources 20 (6), 2020, S. 1458–1469. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13269.
Scholz, Andrea; da Costa Oliveira, Thiago; Dörk, Marian: Infrastructure as Digital Tools and Knowledge Practices. Connecting the Ethnologisches Museum Berlin with Amazonian Indigenous Communities, in: Hahn, Hans Peter; Lueb, Oliver; Müller, Katja u.a. (Hg): Digitalisierung ethnologischer Sammlungen. Perspektiven aus Theorie und Praxis, Bielefeld 2021, S. 299–316. Online: https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839457900-017.
Taylor, Linnet; Floridi, Luciano; Sloot, Bart van der (Hg.): Group privacy. New Challenges of Data Technologies, New York 2017.
United Nations: State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples, New York 2009. Online: https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/SOWIP/en/SOWIP_web.pdf. Stand: 10.03.2022.
Wilkinson, Mark D.; Dumontier, Michel; Aalbersberg, IJsbrand Jan u.a.: The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship, in: Scientific Data 3, 160018, 2016. Online: https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Michaela Rizzolli, Sabine Imeri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
